>--- Original Message --- >From: Ransom, James M. [mailto:JRansom@logicon.com] >Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 8:33 AM >To: 'Kimelheim, Dean';'DeMatta, Elliot';'Whited, Brian';'Elder, Greg'; >'Kristovich, Andy';'Gillis, Kevin J.';'Hernke, Donald N. >CC: 'Newport, Bruce';'Wilkinson, Ken';'Lefler, Dennis';'Cuppett, Bruce'; >Caiase, William P.;Lane, Stephen A. (logicon);Pantaleo, Mark;LaPierre, >John E.;Wheeler, Jimmy L.;Eastman, Jon A.;Riker, Steven; >'Kagawa,Glenn';'Larney, Jim';'Stoner, Roy';'Gunthorpe, Matt'; >'Gruettner, Mark';'Lotts, Matt' >Subject: SSST UPDATE >Importance: High > > >PMA 208 was not able to reach agreeement with any of the offerers on the >SSST Threat "C" competition and a contract will not be awarded under this >solicitation. > >This will have significant impact upon future SSST testing. Currently, >there are 61 VANDAL (EER) targets, 19 VANDAL (ER) targets and 8 MA-31 >targets. PMA208 plans to procure 37 additional MA-31 targets in FY-00, >providing politics does not stop the procurement. VANDAL is out of >production. > >PMA 208 intends to discuss alternatives and their revised plans with PMS >400B4 and others next week. They propose to do this just prior to the >VANDAL support meeting. Would 12:00 on 30 Sep 99, Logicon suite 104, be >acceptable? Alternately, we could discuss SSST plans at 13:00 and delay >the VANDAL support meeting to 14:00? >
All content COPYRIGHT SOFTWAR (C) 2000. Any reproduction or use of content herein must be approved by SOFTWAR.